͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
| This is a SecurityProNews Publication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero Trust for the Agentic AI Era |
Thursday - June 18th 11:00AM PDT | 10:00AM BST | 3:00PM AEST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero Trust for the Agentic AI Era |
Thursday - June 18th
11AM PT | 10AM GMT | 3PM AEST |
|
|
|
|
Three questions worth sitting with: - How many AI agents in your environment are moving from pilot to production?
- Do you actually know what each one can access?
- How would you stop one from acting beyond its intended scope?
Your identity model was built for humans logging in from devices. Agents don't fit that pattern. They act autonomously, call tools, chain workflows, and operate at machine speed, often with privileges nobody fully audited. |
|
|
|
Join us on June 18th, to learn more about: - Why traditional, human-centric Zero Trust models fall short for agents and automated workflows
- How to improve visibility and accountability across agent identities, access, and activity
- How an identity-centric Zero Trust approach strengthens security, increases assurance, and simplifies policy enforcement
|
|
|
|
